We Indians are still clinging onto a mythological fab.we still make those quirky animated movies
every year.First it was giant titles like mahabharatha and ramayana, then came the BAL/chotta series.
It was raining mythological animated stories one after another.Not one was worth the praise.
What's disappointing is that something of religious importance is made with such carelessness & WITHOUT devotion.
And the example i've shown here is the best in those worst titles."Hanuman(2005) was promising and son of ram(2012) was a sign that we can do better.
But all these movie still fails in front of the classic 1992 movie Ramayana - The Legend of Prince Rama(ラーマヤーナ ラーマ王子伝説).
Directed by Yugo Sako and Krishna Shah, this
adaptation of the hindu mythology combines the techniques of Manga(japanese comic art), and those of Indian
classical painting which have been updated by Ram Mohan, the
father of Indian animation.
The film have an outstanding detail that none of it's successors was able to accomplish.With addition to an excellent soundtrack, one could feel the devotion and respect he gave for the story.Yet it never made sense for Indian govt to reject his invitation for a
bi-nation collaboration for the movie.
Court said "Ramayana is not a cartoon" -
clearly unaware how sophisticated, and popular, this art form has become
in the last 20 years.
-a quote from
hinduismtoday.com-
-another interesting quote from
chakra.org-
As
Krishna Shah observes, "Anyone can tell a story, because Ramayana is a
plot-oriented tale, but the key to Sako is that he finds humanity in
his characters. Indeed, this is not a cardboard Ramayana, and the
characters from Ram to Hanuman to Kumbkharna are three-dimensional
ones. Sometimes, you forget these are merely animated figures, for the
film almost has a lush, David Lean kind of ambience." What Sako
particularly likes about the Ramayana and feels is a message for
today's generation is the loving co-existence between the humans and
the animal world that it depicts.
The character design may be a little manga-ish with all the sparkling eyes, but he made sue it was just a normal size.Researching Ramayana top to bottom, he was able to give his animation such depth.
To verify my fondness for this animated movie, i watched Ramayana - The Legend of Prince Rama,
Pandavas - The Five Warriors (2000),
Hanuman (2005),
Krishna (2006),
Ramayana: The Epic (2010),
Bal Ganesh (2009) with a much wider audience.Most of them were my family,hindu devotees and friends . As expected Yugo sako wins them all.They were a little troubled with "pushpaka vimana"(air chariot) depicted in the movie.Except for pandavas and the prince Rama movie, most of the audience left midway.
It's okay if we did some random story without such detail, but when it comes to a legendary story that lives in millions of hearts, it must be given a great deal of respect,detail and devotion.Then only will it be worthy of being called a DEPICTION.
Bibliography
https://www.hinduismtoday.com/modules/smartsection/item.php?itemid=1025
-a letter from yugo sako included in the article-
http://www.chakra.org/discussions/BMOct07_05.html
-an article about ramayana movie and it's distribution problems-
http://www.designinindia.net/design-thoughts/masters/ram-mohan/interview-ramayana-meers-sara.html
http://www.recess.ufl.edu/transcripts/2004/0629.shtml
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramayana:_The_Legend_of_Prince_Rama
http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/anime.php?id=7792